English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The subject matter of this paper is the external and internal syntax of adjectival compounds based on  -ble  adjectives in English (e.g.  vaccine-preventable ,  machine-readable ,  drug-susceptible ) and passive potential adjectives in Polish (e.g.  łatwopalny  ‘combustible’,  lekkostrawny  ‘lit. easily digestible, light’,  szybkozmywalny  ‘quickly-washable’), with special attention paid to whether the syntactic behaviour exhibited by  -ble  and  -ny / -alny  adjectives is also present in compounds headed by them. Drawing on analysis put forth by  Oltra-Massuet (2013) , the present research departs from Oltra-Massuet's account in that certain  ble  adjectives which show irregular morphology (e.g.  visible ,  tolerable ) are interpreted as high (eventive)  -ble  adjectives. It is shown that while synthetic  -ble  compounds in English inherit the syntactic features of their heads, passive potential adjectives in Polish often lose the ability to project the external argument upon being merged with a modifier to form a compound.

Synthetic -BLE compounds VS. -BLE adjectives: Issues in the external and internal syntax