English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Participant evaluations have been at the heart of recent discursive (im)politeness research, yet  despite their importance, there has been little consideration of how we identify such behaviours and  how we can substantiate their worth in an analysis. In this paper, it is proposed that we need to  distinguish between different, ordered, categories of evaluation because these provide different  levels of evidence for participants’ understandings of (im)politeness.

Evaluating evaluations: What different types of metapragmatic behaviour can tell us about participants’ understandings of the moral order