English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the present article, proposed corrections to two passages of Cicero’s treatise  De fato  are examined. It is shown that, on the one hand, a widely accepted correction for §27 that replaces the well attested reading  vera fuerunt instantia  ...  vera erunt instantia  with  vera fuerit instantia  ...  vera erit instantia  is unnecessary, and that, on the other hand, my recently suggested correction for §48, which replaces the obviously false reading  Nam si atomis  ... , illud quoque  ... with  Aut num, si atomis ..., illud quoque ...? , is deficient and should be improved to  Nam si atomis ..., num illud quoque ...?

Ein überflüssiger und ein nur ansatzweise richtiger Eingriff in den überlieferten Text von Ciceros Schrift De fato