English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The paper first reviews previous  analyses of the English tag  and everything , which have shown the tag to  function at both the semantic and pragmatic levels. A comparison is made between  English  and everythingand  the Arabic tag  u-kulši  , and it is pointed out that, while both  English and Arabic versions mark the preceding conjunct as a member of a set, the  Arabic tag can be used in such a way that the set being alluded to is not specified  but is clear from the context. It is argued that such usage indicates that the  tag is being used exclusively as a device of intensification. In an attempt to  marry the idea of u-kulši   as being a degree-based intensifier and a quantity-based set marker,  evidence is presented showing that degree and quantity may swap roles in Arabic  intensification. The speaker’s affective state in relation to the situation in  hand is also seen to be important in analysing the tag and a detailed discussion  is presented of how supra-segmentals operate on the tag and what comes before it  to convey different meanings.

The tag and everything revisited: The case of u-kulši in Arabic