English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This study experimentally investigated the energy-absorbing capability of foam-filled 6063-T5 aluminum tubes. Thus, different sample combinations were created with two different foams, PVC (80 kg m −3 ) and aluminum (200, 350 kg m −3 ), which were used as filling materials. The first group of samples consisted of uniform foam-filled aluminum tubes. In contrast, tubes were filled with radially graded foams in the second group, which included a ring PVC foam and a cylindrical aluminum foam in the center. Empty tube absorbed 329 J, while it reached the values of 384, 488, and 606 J by using PVC and low- and high-density aluminum foams, respectively. The specific energy absorption value of the empty tube was obtained as 23.2 J g −1 . In comparison, it was 19.3 J g −1  in the high-density aluminum foam-filled sample, although it absorbed the highest energy value. This shows that high-density aluminum foam was inefficient in terms of the crashworthiness of the structure. Finally, the best sample regarding the specific energy absorption and crush force efficiency was obtained in the sample where the PVC foam ring and high-density aluminum tube were used together. This sample had 7 % higher specific energy absorption and 34 % higher crush force efficiency than the empty tube.

Investigation on quasi-static axial crushing of Al/PVC foam-filled Al6063-T5 tubes