English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Harvest mouse detectability represents a real issue for surveys, as usual ground-trap monitoring is known to fail to detect this species, especially in summer. The present study proposes to test ground versus aerial live-trapping efficiency for harvest mouse in summer, with a trapping design using paired ground and aerial traps over a 2-year survey in a reedbed. Over 10,720 trap-nights, the harvest mouse represented 85% of the 1078 small mammals captured, and it was the only species among five which was more often trapped above ground (n = 702) than on the ground (n = 213). Capture probability was significantly higher in aerial than in ground traps, with a slightly positive effect of leaf litter and, surprisingly, a negative effect of dense vegetation cover. Following these results, recommendations are made for harvest mouse monitoring.

Improving detectability of the harvest mouse ( Micromys minutus Pallas, 1771) by above ground live-trapping