English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

As Kant shows in A 71–76 of the  First Critique , his table of the twelve “logical functions of understanding” (in A 70) is an indispensable extension of a table of four well-known logical functions that we find in a section of the  Logic  that was “already finished” in Aristotle’s times: The  Square of Oppositions . The undisputed completeness of this  special  table thus warrants the completeness of Kant’s  general  table as well. Any further  philosophical  proof of completeness for Kant’s table of judgements as a whole is therefore not  necessary  at all. And due to the contingency of “kind and number” of human forms of intuition and functions of judgment, such a ‘proof’ would not even be  possible  according to Kant – and thus it is not a subject (or even a part) of his  Transcendental  Deduction of the Categories. A concluding evaluation of Kant’s own statements about the proof-structure of the B-Deduction as a whole supports this claim.

kant-studien

Sollte die    Kritik der reinen Vernunft    die Vollständigkeit der Urteilstafel tatsächlich (nur) „vor Augen stellen“?    Allgemeine reine Logik    und  Transzendentalphilosophie  in Kants Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe