English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

We have previously demonstrated abnormalities in insulin secretion in adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) in response to the mixed meal test and to glucagon. In order to further assess beta-cell function in DM2, we measured insulin and C-peptide responses to oral glucose in adolescents with DM2 in comparison to non-diabetic obese and lean adolescents. We studied 20 patients with DM2, 25 obese adolescents with matching body mass index (BMI) (33.8 +/- 1.4 vs 34.3 +/- 1.0 kg/m2), and 12 non-obese control adolescents (BMI 22.6 +/- 0.6 kg/m2). Mean age, sex and sexual maturation did not differ between the three groups. All adolescents with DM2 had negative islet cell antibodies (ICA); five patients were on diet and 15 on insulin treatment. Fasting lipid profiles were determined in all participants. Plasma glucose and serum C-peptide and insulin levels were measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after an oral glucose load. The C-peptide increment (deltaCP) was calculated as peak minus fasting C-peptide. Area under the curve (AUC) was estimated using the trapezoid method. Insulin resistance was estimated using the HOMA model (HOMA-IR). The first phase of insulin secretion (PH1) was computed using a previously published formula. Serum triglyceride levels were significantly higher in the patients with DM2 compared to the non-obese controls (1.4 +/- 0.1 vs 0.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; p = 0.02). Plasma glucose AUC was greater in the patients with DM2 compared to the obese and non-obese control groups (1,660 +/- 130 vs 717 +/- 17 vs 647 +/- 14 mmol/l x min; p &lt; 0.0001). ACP was lower in adolescents with DM2 than in obese and non-obese adolescents (761 +/- 132 vs 1,721 +/- 165 vs 1,225 +/- 165 pmol/l; p &lt; 0.001). Insulin AUC was lower in the patients with DM2 compared to obese controls (888 +/- 206 vs 1,606 +/- 166 pmol/l x h; p = 0.009), but comparable to that of the non-obese controls (888 +/- 206 vs 852 +/- 222 pmol/l x h; p = 0.9). Insulin AUC was also higher in the obese than in the non-obese group (p = 0.05). PH1 was significantly higher in the obese group compared to the patients with DM2 as well as to the non-obese controls (2,614 +/- 2,47.9 vs 929.6 +/- 403.5 vs 1,946 +/- 300.6 pmol/l, respectively; p = 0.001). PH1 was also higher in the non-obese controls than in the patients with DM2 (p = 0.05). HOMA-IR was three-fold higher in the patients with DM2 than in the BMI-matched obese group, and five-fold higher than in the lean controls (14.3 +/- 1.2 vs 5.4 +/- 0.8 vs 2.9 +/- 0.4; p = 0.0002). Adolescents with DM2 have dyslipidemia, a significant cardiovascular risk factor. Decreased beta-cell function is characteristic of adolescents with DM2 in the presence of severe insulin resistance.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in African-American Adolescents: Impaired Beta-Cell Function in the Face of Severe Insulin Resistance