English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Sex assignment is a major issue in disorders of sexual differentiation (DSD). Not all conditions of DSD have clear recommendations on assignment and timing of surgery. Reports about sex assignment practice and the influence of culture and religion in the Arab region are scarce. Methods A survey questionnaire was distributed to participants in a paediatric endocrinology conference. Four DSD cases were presented. Participants were asked to fill in their answers on sex assignment choice, reasons for the particular assignment, strength of own recommendation and timing of surgery based on their practice. The cases presented were severely virilised XX congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS), severely undervirilised 5α reductase deficiency (5α RD) and XX ovotesticular case. Results Eighty-five endocrinologists participated in the study. Eighty (97.5%) chose a female sex to assign for the XX CAH. For the CAIS, 64 (78%) chose a female sex. Seventy-one (86.5%) voted for a male sex for the XY case of 5α RD. Forty-seven (57%) and 35 (43%) chose a female and a male sex for the ovotesticular case, respectively. The majority indicated that their advice for sex assignment is based on strong recommendations for the CAH, CAIS and 5α RD patients but they were open to the parents' cultural and religious beliefs in their decision of the assignment for the ovotesticular case. Conclusions Practice in the Arab region appears to be in line with the international guidelines in the majority of DSD sex assignment and timing of surgery issues. However, culture and religious beliefs influence the practice in certain circumstances.

Sex assignment practice in disorders of sexual differentiation: survey results from paediatric endocrinologists in the Arab region