English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Both statistical and non-statistical analysis supports a claim that the Latin of Cicero is SDOV. Of 24 bitransitive strings from a representative sample, 21 show either the SDOV order or its common alternate SODV, or are principled departures from these orders, generally from SDOV. SDOV is the rule in clauses that are (1) discourse neutral, that (2) present special discourse challanges either because they involve gapped constituents or are expecially long, or that (3) have verbs of transfer that are lexically marked, e.g.  donare  'gift with'. But those few clauses that do depart radically from the SDOV order, e.g. VOD, VDO, DVO, are always short, simplex, well contexted, and semantically simple. The 42 unitransitive clauses from Cat.l. that manifest three nuclear constituents are distributed as follows: 26 SOV, 12 OSV, 2 each SVO and OVS. This in conjunction with the SDOV data confirm the validity of the unitransitive-bitransitive entailment principle (SDOV=SOV) of Blansitt (1973) for this variety of Latin. The Latin of Cicero has a much more rigid word order than generally thought. An understanding of the constraints serves to establish a point of departure for the further study of the NP displacement system of Latin and of word order in other varieties.

Latin as an SDOV Language: The Evidence from Cicero