English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This contribution offers a concrete, textually based account of the functional possibilities for the expression of different types of possession (exclusive and inalienable “ownership” versus “accidental belonging,” established by convention or on an occasional event) in Archaic Latin. This account is based on the competition between the genitive-marking morphemes - i  and - osio  in archaic Faliscan inscriptions, which has been documented synchronically and for which we suggest a parallelism with the diachronic development of these two morphemes in Archaic Latin. We also confirm the theoretical insights concerning the semantic-functional structures that encode different possession relations and we propose an explanatory path for the generalization of the - ī  versus - osio  genitives (cf. Bolkestein 1983, 2001; Maurel 1989).

- i and - osio genitives in archaic Latin: different markers for different possession types?