English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The present study was designed to follow changes in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values (EIV) in children using the Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implant (CI) during the first 12 months of implant use. The maps of 24 prelingually deaf children implanted at a mean age of 5.9 years (range 1-15.9 years) using the TEMPO+ speech processor programmed with CIS+ strategy were examined at five time points: initial stimulation, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-initial stimulation. Most comfortable levels (M) and electrode impedance values (EIV) were analyzed according to three cochlear segments: apical, medial, and basal. Results indicated a significant increase in M levels until the 3-month time point, thereafter stabilization was evident. Furthermore, M levels in the apical segment were lower than those in the medial and basal segments. EIV decreased from initial stimulation to the 3-month time point and was then stable through the study follow up. Interestingly, the finding of higher EIV in the apical segment may be attributed to the physical characteristics of the Med-El electrode. In conclusion, the pattern of stabilization of M levels found in the present study is similar to that reported for children using other devices. The data presented here may be useful as a guideline for programming M levels and monitoring EIV in infants and young children. They may further help clinicians to identify those children that fall outside the 'typical' range.

Electrical Stimulation Levels and Electrode Impedance Values in Children Using the Med-El Combi 40+ Cochlear Implant: A One Year Follow-Up