English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

The great turn-of-the-century Hungarian orientalist,  Ignaz  Goldziher , found two related aspects of the religion he spent his  life studying especially disagreeable: (1) “the soul-destroying pedantry of the  jurists of Islam” whose “quibbling discriminations” and “dreary exegetical  trifling” proved “detrimental to the inwardness of religion”; and (2) the  inclination among those same “perverters of the law” to “think up contingencies  that will never arise” and entertain “far-fetched legal cases, casuistic  constructs quite independent of the real world” as they indulge in “the boldest  and most reckless flights of fantasy.”  Goldziher  objected, in short, to  what he saw as the dual plague of hair-splitting and theoretical sophistry  afflicting the classical works of Islamic jurisprudence.

Three Shafiʿites in Search of Water: The Indulgence of Tayammum and its Rigorous Preconditions