English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article attempts to adumbrate the social complexity of an urban uprising in Ottoman Aleppo by revisiting the patterns of conflict proposed by the historian Herbert  Bodman . The perceived antagonism between two of the city’s major factions, the ’Ashrāf and the Janissaries, as well as the constant conflicts between these two groups and the representatives of Ottoman authority in the city, provide an insufficient framework for explaining the areas of conflict which Margaret  Meriwether  has identified as major ground for social frictions. Focussing on the uprising in 1819/20 in Aleppo, and relying on the recently published notes of the Armenian Catholic bishop ’Abrāhām Kūbilyān (1786–1832), this article argues that contemporary reports offer new insights into social configurations during the uprising. The reports reflect an awareness of power-political interests of individual persons, as well as social issues concerning myriad groups in society that transcend the narrow horizon of the antagonism between ’Ashrāf and Janissaries.

der islam

Gesellschaftliche Konfigurationen während des Aufstands 1819/20 in Aleppo nach den Aufzeichnungen des armenisch-katholischen Bischofs ’Abrāhām Kūbilyān