English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The effects of drying temperature by continuous and intermittent drying on the drying characteristics of soybean were determined in this study. Among the thin-layer drying models, the Midilli–Kucuk model showed the best fit ( R  2  &gt; 0.99) to describe the drying of soybean. At 300 min of the effective drying time, the moisture content of continuous drying at 35, 40, and 45 ºC were 9.38 (±0.00), 8.69 (±0.17), and 7.70 % (±0.48), respectively; while the moisture content of intermittent drying at 35, 40, and 45 ºC were 8.28 (±0.21), 7.31 (±0.41), and 6.97 % (±0.07), respectively. The image analysis method for detection of the crack in soybean demonstrated that at the target moisture content (7.7 %), cracked grain ratios with intermittent drying at 35, 40, and 45 ºC were reduced by 52.08, 27.59, and 18.24 %, respectively. With the effective drying time, the activation energy for intermittent drying (9.33 kJ/mol) was significantly lower than that value for continuous drying (21.23 kJ/mol).

Drying Characteristics of Soybean ( Glycine Max ) Using Continuous Drying and Intermittent Drying