English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Radial softwood modulus  E   R   is typically twice as high as the tangential modulus  E   T  . The reason for this is unclear, although cell geometry is likely to contribute. The established hexagonal honeycomb model for prediction of  E   R   is based on a cell wall bending mechanism only. If cell wall stretching also takes place, the dependence of  E   R   on relative density will be different. If experimental data for  E   R   as a function of relative density show deviations from cell wall bending predictions, this may indicate the presence of cell wall stretching. A SilviScan apparatus is used to measure density distribution. A procedure by means of digital speckle photography is then developed for measurements of local  E   R   within the annual rings of spruce. Comparison is made between experimental data and the two expected density dependencies from cell wall bending and from stretching. The hypothesis of cell wall stretching as a contributing mechanism is supported based on the observed linear dependence of  E   R   over a wide density range.

Elastic deformation mechanisms of softwoods in radial tension – Cell wall bending or stretching?