English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Real halfband lowpass and complex halfband bandpass filters, versatile building blocks in a multitude of DSP applications, are revisited with focus on efficient implementation. Linear-phase FIR and minimum-phase IIR halfband filters are recalled predominatly for sample rate alteration, their computational loads are compared, and optimum signal flow graphs are presented. The same comparisons are carried out for the corresponding complex halfband filters (Hilbert-transformers with their passbands centred at the normalised frequencies of Ωc = ±π/2) with and without an additional frequency offset by ∆Ω = ±π/4. As expected, the smaller the transition width between passband and stopband, the higher the relative advantage of the IIR approach in terms of computation. Yet, there exist ranges of specifications where linear-phase FIR halfband filters outperform their minimum-phase IIR counterparts – even without taking into account the linear-phase and stability advantages of FIR filters.

Efficient Implementation of Real and Complex Linear-Phase FIR and Minimum-Phase IIR Halfband Filters for Sample Rate Alteration