English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This essay looks at two recent Asian American texts written in the first-person plural – namely Julie Otsuka’s  The Buddha in the attic  (2011) and Chang-rae Lee’s  On such a full sea  (2014). Its main goal is to show that the ambiguities and tensions here generated by  we  narration prove particularly apt when it comes to calling into question essentialist views concerning the anatomy of community-building. But my contention is that these two  we  texts are particularly interesting at a theoretical level, too, in that they help us challenge the orthodoxies of traditional narrative theory – among which Gérard Genette’s all-too-rigid distinction between the homo- and heterodiegetic levels in a text, or the generalized assumption, which has been notably challenged by Mieke Bal, that every act of story-telling is necessarily indebted to ‘a’ narrator, and a narrator of anthropomorphic standards at that.

We narration in Chang-rae Lee’s On such a full sea and Julie Otsuka’s The Buddha in the attic : “Unnaturally” Asian American?