English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article examines language education in Europe and is particularly interested in the gap between policy and life-world practice. Language education is a field of language policy where in pursuing the ‘Mother Tongue + 2’ policy, Europe has developed a unique profile. Its conceptual basis, however, is characterized by inconsistencies and discrepancies. One outcome of European language education policy is the monitoring system that provides data on where, how and to which proficiency level Europeans ‘accumulate’ languages, and that pretends to measure the progress with regard to reaching the ‘Mother Tongue + 2’ goal. In this contribution, it is argued that a creation of ‘multilingual’ Europeans planned (and monitored) in this manner disregards the characteristics of post-modern societies and central aspects of language. This calls for a closer examination of the underlying concept of language and, derived from the former, a common understanding concerning a flexible approach to multilingualism. Using the examples of life-world multilingual pupils and of minority language education in Brittany (France), the paper illustrates how the traditional view of multilingualism ignores or marginalizes existing multilingualism. Future-oriented European language education policy, it is argued, should be based on a rapprochement between policy and multilingual realities.

Where policy doesn’t meet life-world practice – the difficulty of creating the multilingual European