English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Control charts have been established as major tools for quality control and improvement in industry. Therefore, it is always required to consider an appropriate design of a control chart from an economical point of view before using the chart. The economic design of a control chart refers to the determination of three optimal control chart parameters: sample size, the sampling interval, and the control limits coefficient. In this article, the double sampling (DS)X  ¯{\bar{X}}    control chart is considered for the economic design using nonlinear mixed integer programming approach. The triple sampling (TS)X  ¯{\bar{X}}    control charts are developed for economic design based on the results of solving the DSX  ¯{\bar{X}}    chart design problems. In this model, we assume that the process must be shut down during the search for the assignable cause. Multiple samplingX  ¯{\bar{X}}    charts can be designed for quick detection of a small shift in process. The results of the comparison between the economic-statistical design of DS and TSX  ¯{\bar{X}}    control charts show that TSX  ¯{\bar{X}}    control charts are more efficient in terms of minimizing the average sample size, but its expected average cost takes larger values.

Comparison Between the Economic-Statistical Design of Double and Triple Sampling X ¯ \bar{X} Control Charts