English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Within the phenomenological tradition, one frequently finds the bold claim that interpersonal understanding is rooted in a sui generis form of intentional experience, most commonly labelled empathy (Einfühlung). The following paper explores this claim, emphasizing its distinctive character, and examining the phenomenological considerations offered in its defence by two of its main proponents, Edmund Husserl and Edith Stein. Having offered in  section 2  some preliminary indications of how empathy should be understood, I then turn to some characterizations of its distinctive structure, considering, in  section 3 , the Husserlian claim that certain forms of empathy are perceptual in nature, and in  section 4 , Stein’s insistence that empathetic experience frequently involves explicating the other’s own intentional experiences.  Section 5  will conclude by assessing the extent to which their analyses lend support to a conception of empathy as an intuitive experience of other minds.

Wahrnehmung und Explikation: Husserl und Stein über die Phänomenologie der Einfühlung