English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Chromium-free passivation of Zn coating on NdFeB magnets becomes a research hotspot due to the serious harm of chromium ions to the human body. Chromium-based and cerium-based passivation technologies are conducted on electroplating Zn/NdFeB respectively. Morphologies, elemental compositions and phase structures of the two passivated coatings are characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. The corrosion resistances of the two passivated specimens are compared by neutral salt spray test, accelerated aging test and electrochemical measurements. A complete and smooth passivation film can be obtained on the surface of Zn/NdFeB, filling the gaps and pores in Zn coating. Compared with un-passivated Zn/NdFeB, Zn(Ce)/NdFeB and Zn(Cr)/NdFeB possess excellent corrosion resistance. In comparison, Zn(Ce)/NdFeB possesses excellent anti-corrosion performance, increasing the red-rust appearing time from 288 to 432 h, which is still lower than that of Zn(Cr)/NdFeB (528 h). Therefore, the self-repair effect of cerium passivation technology during the corrosion process should be further studied to achieve the purpose of replacing chromium passivation technology.

Comparison of the corrosion resistances of chromium-passivated and cerium-passivated Zn/NdFeB magnets