English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To investigate the characteristics of humic acids (HAs) and the combined effects of HAs on heavy metals, three HAs derived from kitchen waste compost (KW), pig manure compost (PM), and green waste compost (GW) were exposed to Cd(II) and Zn(II). The elemental contents and functional groups of HAs were different due to different raw materials. Fulvic-, humic-like content C1, humic-like content C4, and two protein-like contents C2 and C3 were identified in three HAs by EEM-PARAFAC analysis. The effects of HAs on heavy metals were associated with the metal species and HA source. Our results reveal that titrating Cd(II) caused stronger fluorescence quenching compared to titrating Zn(II) for all HAs. C1 and C4 of KW-HAs and PM-HAs showed fluorescence quenching after Cd(II) was added, whereas negligible fluorescence quenching was found when Zn(II) was added. In addition, C1 and C4 in the GW-HAs did not show obvious fluorescence quenching regardless of whether Cd(II) or Zn(II) was added. C3 in all HAs caused significant fluorescence quenching, suggesting that C3 plays an important role affecting the mobility of heavy metals. Consequently, these results suggest that HAs from KW and PM have greater potential for Cd-contaminated soil remediation than those from GW.

Insight into the cadmium and zinc binding potential of humic acids derived from composts by EEM spectra combined with PARAFAC analysis