English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  For pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia, the soluble fms-like tyrosine-kinase 1 (sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio is a biomarker to aid diagnosis. We performed method comparisons between Elecsys ®  and Kryptor sFlt-1 and PlGF immunoassays and assessed the diagnostic performance for preeclampsia.    Methods  Serum samples from a case-control study involving 113 pregnant women with preeclampsia/elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count (HELLP) and 270 controls were analyzed. sFlt-1 and PlGF were measured using Roche Elecsys ®  and BRAHMS Kryptor sFlt-1/PlGF immunoassays. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratios were calculated, and Passing-Bablok regression/Bland-Altman plots were performed. Gestation-specific cut-offs, ≤33 and ≥85/≥110, were assessed.    Results  Mean (±2 standard deviation [SD]) differences between the Elecsys ®  and Kryptor values were: sFlt-1, 173.13 pg/mL (6237.66, −5891.40); PlGF, −102.71 pg/mL (186.06, −391.48); and sFlt-1/PlGF, 151.74 (1085.11, −781.63). The Elecsys ®  and Kryptor immunoassays showed high correlation: Pearson’s correlation coefficients were 0.913 (sFlt-1) and 0.945 (PlGF). Slopes were 1.06 (sFlt-1) and 0.79 (PlGF), resulting in ~20% lower values for Kryptor PlGF. Sensitivities and specificities using the sFlt-1/PlGF ≥85 cut-off for early-onset preeclampsia (20 + 0 to 33 + 6 weeks) were 88.1%/100.0% (Elecsys ® ) and 90.5%/96.2% (Kryptor), respectively, and using the ≥110 cut-off for late-onset preeclampsia (≥34 + 0 weeks) were 51.3%/96.5% (Elecsys ® ) and 78.9%/90.1% (Kryptor), respectively. Using Elecsys ®  and Kryptor sFlt-1/PlGF, 0% and 3.8% of women, respectively, were falsely ruled-in for early-onset, and 3.5% and 9.9%, respectively, for late-onset preeclampsia.    Conclusions  Despite high correlation between the Elecsys ®  and Kryptor immunoassays, we observed significant differences between sFlt-1/PlGF and PlGF results. Therefore, sFlt-1/PlGF cut-offs validated for Elecsys ®  immunoassays are not transferable to Kryptor immunoassays.

Elecsys ® and Kryptor immunoassays for the measurement of sFlt-1 and PlGF to aid preeclampsia diagnosis: are they comparable?