English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background The commutability of electrolyte trueness verification materials (ETVs) and commercial general chemistry materials (GCs) was evaluated to investigate their suitability for use in an external quality assessment (EQA) program for serum sodium and potassium measurements. Methods Eighty fresh individual human samples (40 for sodium measurements and 40 for potassium measurements), six ETVs and three GCs were analyzed by five routine methods (validated methods) and by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry reference methods (comparative methods) for the determination of sodium and potassium. The commutability was analyzed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP14-A3 protocol and difference in bias approach, respectively. The linearity, bias and imprecision of the routine methods were also assessed according to CLSI guidelines. Results According to EP14-A3 protocol, ETVs were commutable for all assays, and GCs were commutable for 3/5 assays for sodium. ETVs were commutable in most assays except Cobas C501, while GCs showed no commutability except in case of AU5821 for potassium. According to a difference in bias approach, the commutability of ETVs was inconclusive for most routine assays for both sodium and potassium, and GCs were inconclusive for sodium and non-commutable for potassium in most routine assays. The routine methods exhibited excellent linearities and precisions. The majority and minority of relative biases between the routine and reference methods were beyond the bias limits for sodium and potassium, respectively. Conclusions Superiority in the commutability of ETVs over GCs was observed among the sodium and potassium assays whichever evaluation approach was applied.

Commutability of external quality assessment materials for serum sodium and potassium measurements