English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The author considers the manuscript tradition of the Parastaseis syntomoi chronikai, with the goal to understand the nature of the text. Against the recent view which sees in this collection the product of «philosophers» of 8 th  century, he thinks 1) that the collection is not unitary, 2) that it is composed of two or more sections, and 3) that the text preserved by the codex Parisinus gr. 1336 is nearer to the dossier used by both the Anonymus Treu and the Patria Konstantinoupoleos. The author proceeds with some philological remarks and expresses the hypothesis that the manuscript was collection of works with historical contents and/or a depository of historical notes serving for the composition of a chronicle.

Du recueil à l’invention du texte: le cas des Parastaseis Syntomoi Chronikai