English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Supervised automatic sleep scoring algorithms are usually trained using sleep stage labels manually annotated on 30 s epochs of PSG data. In this study, we investigate the impact of using shorter epochs with various PSG input signals for training and testing a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) neural network. An LSTM model is evaluated on the provided 30 s epoch sleep stage labels from a publicly available dataset, as well as on 10 s subdivisions. Additionally, three independent scorers re-labeled a subset of the dataset on shorter time windows. The automatic sleep scoring experiments were repeated on the re-annotated subset.The highest performance is achieved on features extracted from 30 s epochs of a single channel frontal EEG. The resulting accuracy, precision and recall were of 92.22%, 67.58% and 66.00% respectively. When using a shorter epoch as input, the performance decreased by approximately 20%. Re-annotating a subset of the dataset on shorter time epochs did not improve the results and further altered the sleep stage detection performance. Our results show that our feature-based LSTM classification algorithm performs better on 30 s PSG epochs when compared to 10 s epochs used as input. Future work could be oriented to determining whether varying the epoch size improves classification outcomes for different types of classification algorithms.

Automatic sleep scoring with LSTM networks: impact of time granularity and input signals