English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the course of our work on chronological problems of later Roman Egypt, we found much of interest in the long roll published a half-century ago by Edmund H. K a se, Jr., as his dissertation (^4 Papyrux Boll in the Princeton Collection [Baltimore 1933]) and subsequently reprinted as SB V 7^21. We found that in a number of key places the published readings caused difficulties of interpretation, and we were able to check these on a visit to Princeton in 1980. Subsequently, we became convinced that there were other problems in the edition, particularly in the crucial matter of the reading of tax names, and we obtained through the kind offices of Professor Ann Ellis Hanson a good set of photographs. After study of these, we concluded that a complete republication of the text, with a new introduction and notes, would be warranted ; we visited Princeton again in 1982 in order to verify readings. The results of this investigation are presented below.

The Fourth-Century Tax Roll in the Princeton Collection