Contractor-furnished compaction testing: searching for correlations between potential alternatives to the nuclear density gauge in Missouri highway projects
Author(s) -
Kevin W. McLain,
Douglas D. Gransberg
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
international journal of quality and innovation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1756-6983
pISSN - 1756-6975
DOI - 10.1504/ijqi.2017.10011660
Subject(s) - quality assurance , compaction , grading (engineering) , hammer , quality (philosophy) , nuclear material , environmental science , mathematics , engineering , geotechnical engineering , civil engineering , operations management , physics , structural engineering , nuclear physics , quantum mechanics , external quality assessment
The Missouri Department of Transportation’s (MoDOT) past and present Quality Control and Quality Assurance programs for construction are examined. MoDOT’s present Quality Management program along with a small number of grading projects has lowered the number of Quality Assurance (QA) soil compaction tests completed in the past two years. The Department would like to rid itself of using the Nuclear Density Gauges because of burdensome Federal regulations, required training, security and licensing fees. Linear and multiple regression analysis was performed to see if a correlation between nuclear density gauge dry densities values and Light Weight Deflectometer modulus values/ Clegg Hammer Clegg Impact Values exist. These relationships or lack thereof will determine the technology used by construction contractors to perform compaction quality control testing if MoDOT moves away from using nuclear density gauges for soil density verification.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom