English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

1 present in this issue (page 1399) suggests that these assumptions are not well founded. Their results indicate that media reports are rea- sonably accurate, except in specific types of controversial areas, and that cases of inaccuracy may be as much a prod- uct of the researcher's overenthusiasm as of error by the re- porter. These findings are consonant with related research. Early social scientific research on genetics reporting tended to assume that the media were "getting it wrong," 2

Science reporting to the public: Does the message get twisted?