English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of the present study was to determine the maximum mouth opening capacity in seventyeight Angle Class I and Angle Class II, 1 subjects who were non-orthodontically treated and symptom-free of any temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunctions. A standardized clinical examination and cephalometric evaluations were performed. Maximal mouth opening were measured by using a millimetric ruler. Skeletal structure of the groups were analysed with the lateral cephalograms. Differences among the groups were evaluated using t-test. Pearson correlation analysis was used for the correlation analysis. Angle Class I subjects had higher levels of maximum mouth opening capacity than subjects with Angle Class II,1 ( 47.77 ± 4.69 vs 45.36 ± 5.02 mm, p<0.05). A positive correlation between the maximum mouth opening capacity and the ramus length was found in Angle Class I subjects. Also a negative correlation was found between the maximum mouth opening and the vertical dimensions of facial height. A positive correlation between maximum mouth opening and the mandibular dimensions was determined in Angle Class II, 1 subjects. In conclusion, differences in maximum mouth opening capacity depend on the mandibular morphology.

SINIF I VE SINIF II, 1 ADOLESAN DÖNEMİ BİREYLERDE MAKSİMUM AĞIZ AÇILIM MESAFESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI