English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In moderate esotropia there is a dilemma whether to operate on one muscle, performing a large unilateral recession (MRR) or on two muscles, performing traditional bilateral (BMRR) recessions of medial rectus muscles. Aim: To compare the effect /mm recession of a large MRR and traditional BMRR in moderate esotropia as well as the motor outcome 6 months after surgery. Material and methods: 200 patients with alternating/alternated esotropia were operated on for the period of 2000-2014. BMRR were performed in 170 patients (340 eyes), the traditional (up to 5 mm) being in 16 (8%). Their effect /mm recession was compared to the effect of large MRR which was performed in 30 cases. Diagnostic, surgical and statistical methods were used.

Comparison between traditional bilateral and large unilateral medial rectus muscle recession for moderate esotropia