English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The present paper is a direct continuation of the first part Potencionality of Quantitative and Corpus Analysis to Literary Studies – Toward Methodology (The Analysis of Themtic Fields), which was published in third number of this journal in 2016. In this study we present in detail the exploration of posibilities of interpretation using quantitative and corpus methods and illustrate the way, how specific we can use the results of the named metohod in the literary interpretation. I. Assessment and interpretation As we can observe the frequency analysis is not a mere formal quantification. It naturally has a qualitative dimension which reflects the choice of particular lexis appearing in the area above the h-point. Mutual relation of both aspects (quantitative and qualitative) is not coincidental, it is a projection of immanent structural and semantic rules found in a particular text. This fact can be proved by the following test in which we attached relative frequency values from three completely different corpuses to frequency values of thematic words from selected Èep subcorpuses. The first corpus (ÈAPEK 1) contains selected and processed works of Karel Èapek written in the 1920s, the second corpus (ÈAPEK 2) includes selected works of the same author written in the 1930s. Frequency values were subsequently compared with referential corpuses SYN2010_BEL a SYN2010. Table 1. Compared corpuses

The Interpretation of Quantitative and Corpus Analysis of Thematic Fields in First Collections of Short Stories by Jan Èep