English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

DOI:10.14744/bej.2020.76476 Beyoglu Eye J 2020; 5(1): 32-37 Original Article Karslioglu et al., Keratopigmentation: A Miracle or an Adventure? 33 gical procedures. KTP could be a very beneficial option, as it is a less invasive operation, has a high patient satisfaction rate, a smaller cost, and potential accessibility (13). In order to reduce the potential effects of a sensation of a foreign body and activation of the inflammatory response, micronized mineral pigments with smaller particles are now preferred (8). The early intrastromal techniques could not eliminate the possibility of permanent superficial corneal opacity (11). Superficial KTP may be an alternative for patients with disfigured, blind eyes with corneal opacities, leukomas, or neovascularization (18). It has been demonstrated that superficial KTP can be a conservative and precise method to treat leukomatous lesions (2). This study was an examination of the cosmetic and functional results of patients who underwent KTP at a single center.

Keratopigmentation: Is it a miracle or an adventure?