English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

As Korea has developed into an aging society with evolving socio­ economic standards, upper blepharoplasty has become one of the most popular rejuvenation procedures. Conventional upper bleph­ aroplasty through a supratarsal incision has been widely accepted, and involves excision of redundant skin and muscle with or with­ out creation of an eyelid fold. However, the drawbacks of this technique, including insufficient removal of redundant lateral skin, a scar beyond the lateral canthus, and an unnatural postoperative appearance, have led to plastic sur­ geons to avoid conventional upper blepharoplasty [1]. Moreover, since Asians tend to have higher eyebrows than Caucasians and more pretarsal and suborbicularis fat, the drawbacks of the conven­ tional procedure have become increasingly apparent [2,3]. The infrabrow excision blepharoplasty technique was used by many Korean surgeons even before it was first reported. This tech­ nique includes elliptical excision of the infrabrow skin and subcu­ taneous tissue with or without the orbicularis oculi muscle (OOM) to alleviate lid redundancy [4]. However, only a few reports have described suture fixation of the OOM in the flap inferior to the su­ praorbital rim [5]. Woo Ju Kim, Han Koo Kim, Tae Hui Bae, Woo Seob Kim

Analysis of subbrow upper blepharoplasty by measuring the lid-to-brow distance