English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Edwardsâ€™ (2010) article illuminates the benefits of systematic case series analysis in exploring metacompetencies such as therapist responsiveness. Â  These benefits are unique contributions of systematic case analyses since the situational and temporal contexts provided by cases are Â  lost in group comparison research such as randomized clinical trials. Â  For this reason, the two approaches triangulate well with each other, in the sense described by Edwards. Â  Aggregation of findings from multiple cases facilitates generalization. Â  Edwardâ€™s systematic case series of PTSD treatments demonstrates one important and pragmatic way in which this generalization can be accomplished. Â  I discuss Edwardâ€™s approach to studying therapist responsiveness in light of methodology, theory-building, training, and case formulation.

Case Studies Help Us Read Between the Lines of Manual-Driven Therapy