English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This is an introduction to a series of three articles that address the potentials and challenges of a systematic and naturalistic approach to the case study method as embodied in the design of this PCSP journal, a model that the late Kenneth Howard called "patient-focused research." These articles help to advance this model by addressing continuing barriers to case studies achieving an equal place at the therapy research table. These barriers can be found in politics and ideology (Edwards); in epistemology (Eells); in the logic of knowledge generation (Edwards and Eells); and in the relative lack of scientific rigor in a psychotherapy area that has traditionally embraced case studies, psychoanalysis (Messer). The three articles are followed by an integrating discussion (Caspar). As a group, these articles provide a persuasive rationale for the value of properly conducted case studies as a complement to group studies in improving the effectiveness of psychotherapy.

Seeking an Equal Place at the Therapy Research Table: An Introduction to a Series on the Pragmatic Case Study Method