English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A precise quantification of the sea surface partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO 2(water) ) at the water surface is required in order to define the role of the sea in air-sea exchange of CO 2 . Even though the pCO 2(water) can be measured directly, the semi-empirical model has seen numerous application in determining the pCO 2 (water) due to a time-and cost-efficient. This study aims to compare the pCO 2 and FCO 2 (Flux of CO 2 ) calculated using Zhai and Zhu algorithm with the underway datasets of pCO 2 obtained during the scientific cruise of CISKA-SPICE III in April 2013. The partial pressure of CO 2 (pCO 2 ) was measured using a high-accuracy electrochemical instrumentation underway HydroC/CO 2 FT (flow through) with an error ±1 μ atm. Furthermore, in order to calculate the pCO 2 and the FCO 2 employing widely used algorithms, some data were needed including wind speed, sea surface temperature and chlorophyll-a extracted from MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer). According to the results obtained, the difference between the pCO 2 and FCO 2 derived from those two algorithms are significant. The underway datasets of pCO 2 are ranging from 409.52-544.01 µatm. Meanwhile, the pCO 2 derived using the Zhai algorithm and Zhu algorithm are between 405.003–422.79 µatm and 398.94-752.06 µatm respectively. The FCO 2 are varied between 0.02–0.06 molC . m - 2 .day -1 (Zhai algorithm ), 0.02-0.57 molC . m - 2 .day -1  (Zhu algorithm ) dan 0.04-0.23 molC . m - 2 .day -1 (the underway datasets). A comparison of the two results reveals that pCO 2 derived using Zhai algorithm is closer with the underway datasets compared with the result of pCO 2 calculated using Zhu algorithm with the MRE (Mean Relative Estimation Error) as large as 19.4% and 39% respectively. Taken together, these results suggest that the Zhai algorithm is more appropriate to determine a lgorithms for e stimating the a ir-sea e xchange of carbon dioxide in the Malacca Straits. Keywords: carbon dioxide , Malacca Straits , pCO 2 , FCO 2 , Zhai and Zhu algorithm

Quantitative Comparison of Algorithms for Estimating the Air-sea Exchange of Carbon Dioxide in Malacca Straits