English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the basic theories of first-language acquisition that attempt to explain how infants learn their primary languages children are treated some- times as a ‘black box’, at times as a ‘universal grammarian”, and at times almost as a ‘processor’, and they are seen as objects in a laboratory where emotional factors are ignored.  This article is the outcome of a thorough survey of literature and primarily it aims to present the most widely accepted language acquisition theories. In addition, we shall try to describe the restrained position of first language acquisition theories towards the impact of affects and emotional factors on the acquisition process.  Apart from that, our study aims to find out whether or not the classical and popular theories of language acquisition have empirical or theoretical answers as to the effect variables like joy, happiness, worry, anxiety, introversion, aggression or loneliness have on linguistic development.  In the centre of the research are the most widely accepted first-language acquisition theories. In this article, behaviorist (Burrhus F. Skinner), nativist (Noam Chomsky), interactionist (Jerome Brunner), usage-based (Michael Tomasello) and linear (William O’Grady) theories of first-language acquisition will be generally examined and the connection of affect and emotion with linguistic development will be discussed in detail as to the place it occupies in the literature. Ozet Cocuklarin anadillerini nasil ogrendiklerini aciklamaya calisan temel ilk dil edinim kuramlarinda cocuklar kimi zaman: “kara kutu”, kimi zaman: “evrensel bir gramerci”, bazen de adeta bir: “islemci” olarak ele alinmis ve duygusal faktorlerin surekli goz ardi edildigi bir laboratuvar objesi olarak gorulmuslerdir.  Elinizdeki bu makale, derinlemesine bir alan yazin taramasinin urunudur ve herseyden once en cok kabul gormus/goren dil edinim kuramlarini ana hatlariyla sunmayi hedeflemektedir. Bununla birlikte ilgili kuramlarin duygulanim ve duygusal faktorlerin edinim surecine olan etkisi konusuna yonelik takindigi mesafeli pozisyonu gostermeyi deneyecegiz.  Calismamiz bunun disinda; sevinc, mutluluk, endise, kaygi, ice donukluk, agresyon, yalnizlik gibi degiskenlerin dilsel gelisime olan etkisi konusunda klasik ve populer dil edinim kuramlarinin teorik ya da empirik yanitlarinin olup olmadigini ortaya koymak gayesini tasimaktadir.  Arastirmanin merkezinde en cok bilinen ve kabul edilen ilk dil edinim kuramlari yer almaktadir. Bu makalede; davranisci (Burrhus F. Skinner), nativist (Noam Chomsky), etkilesimsel (Jerome Brunner), kullanim temelli (Michael Tomasello) ve dogrusalci  (William O´Grady) ilk dil edinim kuramlari ana hatlariyla irdelenecek ve duygu ya da duygulanim olgularinin dilsel gelisim ile olan bagintisi konusunun dilbilim literaturunde kapladigi yer ve bu iliskinin goz ardi edilip, edilmedigi konusu masaya yatirilacaktir.

The place of affect and emotion in the theories of first language acquisition<p>İlk dil edinim kuramlarında duygulanım ve duygu olgularının yeri