English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this study, marital satisfaction and forgiveness processes were investigated in the quantitative and qualitative dimensions of those who persisted in marriage after deceit. In the quantitative aspect of the research, marital satisfaction and forgiveness variables were examined in terms of gender, duration of marriage, and time spent on deception. In the qualitative dimension, the response to the allegation is discussed under the themes of the deception's contribution to forgiveness, dealing with the deception process, the process after forgiveness and the forgiveness of marriage. While the study group quantitative consisted of 41 women and 8 men volunteers, the qualitative dimension was realized on 5 women and 5 men volunteers. The data were collected using the Personal Information Form Marriage Satisfaction Scale, the interpersonal Motivation Scale for suicide and the open-ended questionnaire developed by the researchers which helpsinterpreting and grading. According to the quantitative results of the study, marital satisfaction and forgiveness scores did not differ according to gender, duration of marriage, and time spent on cheating. According to qualitative analysis, it is seen that deceived men and women give different emotional reactions;The most irritating situation in deception is that someone else is preferred to husband or wife It has been found that after the deception the women have made a lot of effort while the men have made no efforts to be forgiven. In addition, it has been found that the levels of forgiveness of women and men participating in the survey are low.Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text PDF (TURKISH) file.OzetBu arastirmada aldatma sonrasi evliligini surduren kisilerde evlilik doyumu ve affetme surecleri nicel ve nitel boyutta incelenmistir. Arastirmanin nicel boyutunda aldatma sonrasinda evlilik doyumu ve affetme degiskenleri cinsiyet, evlilik suresi ve aldatmanin uzerinden gecen sure degiskenleri cercevesinde incelenmistir. Nitel boyutta ise veriler aldatmaya verilen tepki, aldatanin affetmeye katkisi, aldatma sureciyle bas etme, affetme sonrasi surec ve affetme-evlilik doyumu temalari altinda ele alinmistir. Nicel boyutun calisma grubunu 41 kadin, 8 erkek olustururken nitel boyut gonullu 5 kadin, 5 erkek uzerinde gerceklestirilmistir. Veri toplama araci olarak, Kisisel Bilgi Formu, Evlilik Doyum Olcegi, Suca Iliskin Kisiler Arasi Motivasyon Olcegi ve arastirmacilar tarafindan gelistirilen yorumlama ve derecelendirme sorularindan olusan acik uclu anket formu kullanilmistir. Arastirmanin nicel sonuclarina gore, evlilik doyumu ve affetme puanlarinin cinsiyet, evlilik suresi, aldatmanin uzerinden gecen sure ve aldatma turune gore farklilasmadigi gorulmustur. Nitel analizlere gore ise, aldatilan kadin ve erkeklerin farkli duygusal tepkiler verdikleri; aldatmada en orseleyici olan durumun, bir baskasinin ese tercih edilmesi oldugu; aldatma sonrasinda erkeklerin affedilmek icin hic caba harcamazken kadinlarin cok caba harcadigi tespit edilmistir. Ayrica arastirmaya katilan kadin ve erkeklerin affetme duzeylerinin dusuk oldugu gorulmustur.

journal of human sciences

Marriage satisfaction and forgiveness in people who continue their marriage after infidelity&lt;p&gt;Aldatma sonrası evliliğini sürdüren kişilerde evlilik doyumu ve affetme