English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Purpose : The purpose of this study is to investigate faculty members’ organizational silence behaviors, the effects of reasons leading to silence, the consequences of silence behaviors and their relationships with some variables of gender and academic titles. Method : The study was conducted as a quantitative descriptive research. The sample of the study is comprised of 554 faculty members. The data of the study were collected through the administration of three questionnaires developed by the researchers to the sample group. In data analysis, descriptive statistics, t-test for independent groups, one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) were employed. Results : The major results of the study are: (1) The faculty members exhibit the silence behavior in three problem areas to a great extent (non-ethical behaviors and practices, administrative functioning and practices and academic structure and functioning) (2) Both the individual factors and factors related to administrative practices are effective over a moderate level in the faculty members’ exhibiting the silence behavior. (3) The faculty members are of the opinions that their organizational silence behaviors result in problems that can considerably affect individual and organizational efficiency. (4) Among all staff, the research assistants show the most silence behavior and observe the consequences of the silence behavior the most. In short, organizational silence is an important managerial proble. Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text  PDF (TURKISH)  file . Ozet Amac : Bu calismanin amaci ogretim elemanlarinin orgutsel sessizlik davranisina yol acan sorunlari, nedenlerini ve sonuclarini belirlemek ve cinsiyet ve akademik unvan degiskenleri ile iliskisini incelemektir. Yontem : Tarama modelinde betimsel bir calisma olan arastirmanin orneklemini 554 ogretim elemani olusturmaktadir. Arastirmanin verileri arastirmacilar tarafindan gelistirilen uc olcegin ornekleme uygulanmasiyla elde edilmistir. Arastirma verilerinin cozumlenmesinde betimsel istatistikler, karsilastirmalarda t-testi ve varyans analizi (ANOVA) kullanilmistir. Sonuclar : Arastirmada su temel sonuclara ulasilmistir: (1) Ogretim elemanlari uc sorun alaninda (etik olamayan davranis ve uygulamalar, yonetsel isleyis ve uygulamalar, akademik yapi ve isleyis) onemli olcude sessizlik davranisi gostermektedirler. (2) Ogretim elemanlarinin sessizlik davranisi gostermelerinde hem bireysel etmenler hem de yonetsel uygulamalarla ilgili etmenler orta duzeyin ustunde etkili olmaktadir. (3) Ogretim elemanlari orgutsel sessizlik davranislarinin bireysel ve kurumsal etkililigi etkileyebilecek sorunlara yol actigi dusuncesine oldukca yuksek duzeyde sahiptirler. (3) Arastirma gorevlileri en fazla sessizlik gosteren ve sonuclarindan en fazla etkilenen akademik unvan grubu olarak gorunmektedir. Kisaca orgutsel sessizlik universiteler icin ustesinden gelmek icin caba gosterilmesi gereken onemli bir yonetsel sorun alandir.

journal of human sciences

Organizational silence behaviors of faculty members, their causes and consequences&lt;p&gt;Öğretim elemanlarında örgütsel sessizlik davranışı, nedenleri ve sonuçları