English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This research has two purposes. One of them is to determine rectors candidates' leadership behaviours and the other is to determine their leadership styles. As regards first purpose it has been done in the case of qualitative analysis. 7 rector candidates have dispatched 298 e-mails to academic staff in April-July 2016 during the rector elections in a state university in Akdeniz region. It was analyzed by content analysis on these e-mails in this research. The other purpose is that has been done in the direction of convergent pattern of qualitative analysis. It had gaven closed ended surveys to four academics, to objectively determine the leadership style of the rector candidates. In survey was written ten leadership styles determined by investigator. These academics observed candidates' behaviours as determining leadership of participants during the rector elections. These four social scientists who studied in different areas of social sciences voluntarily and were completed closed ended surveys. In the first part of the research was done as regards to 7 rector candidates who were and was done alphabet coding between A-G each of them during analysis. It used convenient sampling technique which is one of the purpose sampling methods in research. Also, descriptive analysis was conducted to increase the validity of the study. According to results; Discourses of participants were collected four sub- themes. These are discourses of related management, discourses of related scientific studies, discourses of related educational and teaching and discourses of related scholars’ working conditions and their rights. A, C and G participant made the most discourses 85.71% about discourses of related management subtheme than the others. Participant B made more discourses 62.50% about discourses of related scientific research sub-theme than the others. Participant G made more discourses 100% about related educational and teaching subtheme than the others and B participant made more discourses 83.33% about related scholars’ working conditions and their rights than the others. With respect to discourses of based project; G participant made the most discourses 40% than the others. Participant B made the most discourses of introduce yourself 60% than the others. Leadership styles of participants in the direction of their sending e-mails to follower when it was analysed that leadership styles of all participants had business-oriented leadership, second 71.42% democratic leadership and it follows them at the same rate 42.85% relationship-oriented leadership and empowering leadership. As a result of the social scientists that were observed and determined about leadership styles of participants by four social scientists; it was found leadership style of relationship-oriented was come forward this finding follows in order of leadership styles of business-oriented and leadership style of democratic. Also, it was determined leadership style for each of participants in study. Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text  PDF (TURKISH)  file . Ozet Bu arastirmanin iki amaci vardir; birincisi universite rektor adaylarinin (katilimcilar) liderlik davranislarini ve ikincisi lidelik stillerini belirlemektir. Ilk amacla ilgili olarak nitel analizin durum deseni dogrultusunda calisma yapilmistir. Akdeniz bolgesindeki bir devlet universitesinde yapilan rektorluk secimlerinde 7 rektor adayinin Nisan - Temmuz 2016 tarihleri arasinda ogretim uyelerine gonderdikleri 298 e-posta icerik analizine tabi tutularak incelenmistir. Rektor adaylarinin rektorluk secim surecinde kendilerine oy veren ogretim uyelerine (takipcilerine) gonderdikleri e-postalardaki mesajlarda kullandiklari ifadeleri dokuman analizine tabi tutulmustur. Arastirmanin ikinci amaciyla ilgili olarak nitel analizin yakinsayan parallel deseni dogrultusunda calisma yapilmistir. Bunun icin rektor adaylarinin liderlik stillerini objektif olarak belirlemek amaciyla bagimsiz ve gonullu dort farkli alandan sosyal bilimci akademisyene on liderlik stilini tanimlayan kapali uclu anketler verilmistir. Yanitlayici sosyal bilimcilerin rektor adaylariyla ilgili gozlem ve degerlendirmeleri dogrultusunda liderlik stilleri belirlenmeye calisilmistir. Arastirmanin ilk kisminda rektor adaylariyla ilgili olarak A-G arasinda alfabetik kodlama yapilmistir. Arastirmada amacli ornekleme yontemlerinden kolayda ornekleme teknigi kullanilmistir. Arastirmanin gecerliligini artirmak icin betimsel analize de yer verilmistir. Elde edilen sonuclara gore; Katilimcilarin takipcilerine yonelik soylemleri dort alt temada toplanmistir. Bunlar: Yonetimle iliskili soylemler, Bilimsel Calismalara Iliskin Soylemler, Egitim ve Ogretime Iliskin Soylemler ve Akademisyenlerin Calisma Kosullarina ve Haklarina Iliskin Soylemler Alt Temasi . Yonetimle iliskili soylemler alt temasinda; A, C ve G katilimcilari %85.71 ile en fazla soylemde bulunmustur. Bilimsel Calismalara Iliskin soylemler alt temasinda B katilimcisi %62.50 ile en fazla soylemde bulunmustur. Egitim ve Ogretime Iliskin Soylemler alt temasinda G katilimcisi %100 ile en fazla soylemde bulunmustur. Akademisyenlerin Calisma Kosullarina ve Haklarina Iliskin Soylemler alt temasinda B katilimcisi %83.33 ile en fazla soylemde bulunmustur. Proje temelli soylemlerle ilgili olarak, G katilimcisi %40 ile en fazla proje soyleminde bulunan katilimci olmustur. Kendilerini tanitma soylemi alt temasinda F katilimcisi %60 ile en fazla kendini tanitma soyleminde bulunmustur. Katilimcilarin takipcilerine gonderdikleri e-posta dogrultusunda liderlik stilleri incelendiginde, tum katilimcilarda is yonelimli liderlik stilinin one ciktigi, bunu %71.42 ile demokratik liderlik ve %42.85 ile iliski yonelimli ve ayni oranla guclendirici liderligin izledigi belirlenmistir. Dort sosyal bilimcinin liderlik stiliyle ilgili katilimcilari degerlendirmeleri sonucunda ise, iliski yonelimli liderlik stilinin katilimcilarda one ciktigi, bunu is yonelimli ve demokratik liderligin izledigi bulunmustur.

journal of human sciences

An Analysis of leadership behaviors and leadership styles of rector candidates on the context of the rectorship election at university<p>Üniversitede rektör adaylarının liderlik davranışlarının ve liderlik stillerinin rektörlük seçimleri bağlamında incelenmesi

An Analysis of leadership behaviors and leadership styles of rector candidates on the context of the rectorship election at universityÜniversitede rektör adaylarının liderlik davranışlarının ve liderlik stillerinin rektörlük seçimleri bağlamında incelenmesi

An Analysis of leadership behaviors and leadership styles of rector candidates on the context of the rectorship election at university
Üniversitede rektör adaylarının liderlik davranışlarının ve liderlik stillerinin rektörlük seçimleri bağlamında incelenmesi