English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this work, we aimed to examine the realty-appearance duality solutions and the results they have discussed in the Husserl and Bergson ontologies on the axis of being appearance dichotomy. One of the fundamental problems of the ontology is the reality-appearance duality, which has been discussed in the context of the being-appearance dichotomy from the Ancient Greek philosophy. The reality-appearance duality is one of the basic problems of ontology in the 20th century as it was in the previous periods. Husserl and Bergson wanted to analyze and solve the problem of reality-appearance duality in their ontologies, as a reaction, on the axis of Plato, Aristoteles, Descartes, Kant and Hegel discussions. Husserl has developed a phenomenological method to solve the problem of reality-appearance duality. Husserl discusses the reality-appearance duality primarily through essence. According to him, the things we understand are not the looks, but the essences, as Kant said. The truth is only the essences. What we perceive as our appearance is the images given of the essences. He discusses the reality-appearance duality through being / experience. In Husserl's ontology, being and experience are in fact identical. When it is called being, it understands experience, and when it is called experience, it understands being. He, divides into two parts the entity, a phenomenological entity and a real entity. Phenomenological entity is real entity and corresponds to truth. Real entity is relative asset and corresponds to appearance. Bergson has developed an irrational method of intuitionism, which is to solve the reality-appearance duality. At the beginning of his ontology has a reality-appearance duality as it is in Husserl. It is the crude and lifeless matter that emerges at the places where evolution pauses and is about the physics in the creative evolution process that Bergson refers to as appearance. The truth is that life is the world of life, in which creative evolution continues and can only be perceived and perceived through time. There is an ontological and epistemological difference between the material world and the life world. Thus, Husserl and Bergson aim to reach knowledge about the essence of reality, namely the nature of existence, by discussing the reality-appearance duality in their ontologies. While Husserl is reached knowledge of the essence of existence with pure consciousness, Bergson reached with intuition and time. Extended English abstract is in the end of  PDF (TURKISH)  file . Ozet Bu calismamizda Husserl ile Bergson ontolojilerinde varlik-gorunus dikotomisi ekseninde tartisilan gercek-gorunus ikiligi cozumlemelerini ve vardiklari sonuclari incelemeyi amacladik. Ontolojinin temel problemlerinden biri olan gercek-gorunus ikiligi Antik Cag Yunan felsefesinden itibaren varlik-gorunus dikotomisi baglaminda tartisilmistir. Gercek-gorunus ikiligi onceki donemlerde oldugu gibi 20. yuzyilda da ontolojinin temel problemlerinden biridir. Husserl ve Bergson, ontolojilerinde gercek-gorunus ikiligi problemini Platon, Aristoteles, Descartes, Kant ve Hegel tartismalari ekseninde onlara bir tepki olarak ele alip cozumlemek istemislerdir. Husserl gercek-gorunus ikiligi problemini cozmek icin fenomenolojik yontemi gelistirmistir. Husserl gercek-gorunus ikiligini oncelikle ozler uzerinden tartisir. Ona gore kavradigimiz seyler Kant’in da dedigi gibi gorunusler degil, ozlerdir. Gercek olan yalnizca ozlerdir. Bizim gorunus olarak algiladigimiz ise ozlerin verilmisligindeki goruntulerdir. O, gercek-gorunus ikiligini ikinci olarak varlik/yasanti uzerinden tartisir. Husserl’in ontolojisinde varlik ile yasanti adeta ozdeslesmistir. Varlik denildigide yasanti, yasanti denildigide varlik anlasilir. Varligi, fenomenolojik varlik ve reel varlik olmak uzere ikiye ayirir. Fenomenolojik varlik gercek varlik olup hakikate karsilik gelmektedir. Reel varlik ise goreceli varlik olup gorunuse karsilik gelmektedir. Bergson ise gercek-gorunus ikiligini cozmek icin irrasyonel bir yontem olan sezgiciligi gelistirmistir. Onun ontolojisinin baslangicinda da Husserl’de oldugu gibi gercek-gorunus ikiligi vardir. Bergson’un gorunus olarak kastettigi yaratici evrim surecinde evrimin duraksadigi yerlerde ortaya cikan ve fizigin konusu olan kaba ve cansiz maddedir. Gercek ise yaratici evrimin devam ettigi ve ancak sure ile fark edilip sezgi ile kavranilabilen varliktir, yani yasam dunyasidir. Madde dunyasi ile yasam dunyasi arasinda ontolojik ve epistemolojik bir fark vardir. Boylelikle Husserl ile Bergson ontolojilerinde gercek-gorunus ikiligi tartismalariyla gercekligin ozune yani varligin ozune iliskin bilgiye ulasmayi amaclamaktadirlar. Husserl varligin ozune iliskin bilgiye saf bilinc ile ulasirken Bergson ise sezgi ve sure ile ulasmaktadir.

journal of human sciences

Comparison of Husserl and Bergson ontologies in realty-appearance: Being-appearance dichotomy&lt;p&gt;Husserl ve Bergson ontolojilerinin gerçek-görünüş ikiliğinde karşılaştırılması: Varlık-görünüş ikiliği