English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

With the transition to democratic life and the adoption of multi-party systems in the world, the concepts of majority and pluralism have become increasingly important. Majority and pluralism which are based on the concept of self-rule, have changed the management power in favor of the ruled, on the other hand they brought some debates in terms of government. Single party power which means the domination of majority and coalition process means pluralism are criticized in terms of merit in administration. Although democracy gives the right to equal participation in governance, state administration merit and experience represent a process that has become the foreground of state tradition. In particular, inter-party conflicts of interests in the coalition government, conflicts in management and polyphony can lead to a slower pace of government while at the same time bringing democracy into practice. For this reason, it is important that the difference between coalition and single-party power should be examined and put forth in multi-party systems. In this study, it is aimed to reveal this difference through the political history ofTurkey. According to the results obtained by literature review in the study, although coalition-based administration leads to delay in making decisions in state administration and public service but it is seen as a necessity of democracy. As a result, it is argued that the main problem in a fast-growing country likeTurkeyis conflict of interests between coalition partners, not coalition governments. Extended English abstract is in the end of PDF (TURKISH)  file. Ozet Demokratik yasama gecis ve cok partili sistemlerin dunyada yerini almasiyla birlikte, cogunluk ve cogulculuk kavramlari giderek onem kazanmistir. Her iki kavram temel olan halkin kendi kendisini yonetmesi ilkesi, bir yandan yonetim gucunu yonetilen lehinde degistirirken, bir yandan da yonetim acisindan bazi tartismalari da beraberinde getirmistir. Cogunlugun hukmetmesi anlamina gelen tek parti iktidari ile cogulculugun hukmetmesi anlamina gelen koalisyon sureci uzerine yapilan elestirilerin basinda, yonetimde liyakat konusu gelmektedir. Demokrasi her ne kadar yonetime esit katilma hakki verse de, devlet yonetimi liyakat ve deneyimin, devlet geleneginin on plana ciktigi bir sureci ifade etmektedir. Ozellikle koalisyon yonetimindeki partiler arasi cikar catismalari, yonetimdeki anlasmazliklar ve cok seslilik, bir yandan demokrasiyi uygulama alanina tasirken, diger yandan yonetimde daha yavas bir seyre  neden olabilmektedir. Bu nedenle cok partili sistemlerde koalisyon ve tek parti iktidarlari arasindaki farkin incelenmesi ve ortaya koyulmasi onemlidir. Yapilan bu calismada, bu farkin Turkiye siyasal tarihi uzerinden ortaya konmasi amaclanmistir. Arastirmada elde edilen sonuclara gore koalisyona dayali yonetim devlet yonetiminde karar almada gecikmeye neden olup, kamu hizmetlerinin aksamasina yol acsa da, demokrasinin bir geregi olarak gorulmektedir. Neticede Turkiye gibi hizli buyuyen bir ulke yonetimindeki temel sorunun koalisyon yonetimleri degil, koalisyon ortaklarinin arasindaki cikar catismalari oldugu savunulmaktadir.

journal of human sciences

An analysis regarding effectiveness of coalitions and single party power in multi-party systems: The case of Turkey&lt;p&gt;Çok partili sistemlerde koalisyon ve tek parti iktidarının etkinliğine ilişkin bir inceleme: Türkiye örneği