English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article claims that national migration policies are limited by some externalities. These limitations are so powerful that they do not nearly let national governments decision-making about migration policies. In the last decade, Turkey, struggling with enormous immigration inflows, is the most obvious example of this situation. On one side, some international organizations forcing Turkey to be their policy instrument, and on the other side, Turkey tries to keeping some tenets like humanitarian diplomacy policy and some human rights agreements. In addition to these restrictions, there are others already accepted in the literature of decision-making on public policy. In conclusion, the article is dissolving whether Turkey’s making migration policy with descriptive method is possible or not and under coercive externalities, it reaches that is difficult to design a rational migrant policy.

COERCIVE EXTERNALITIES IN DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES: IS IT POSSIBLE MIGRATION POLICY FOR TURKEY?