English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

One of the main strategies of those who perpetrated the Nazi genocide was to eliminate any kind of trace. This is showed by both the disappearance of the corps as the unwillingness to leave on written supporting documents the task undertaken. Conversely, the impulse felt by the survivors as a mechanism to prevent such an event to be repeated, was to «bear witness» (Levi, 2006:623) on the experience. Thus, the memory was formed as a resistance mechanism, both individually and collectively. But is in itself any act of remembering an exercise of memory? Can you evoke a fact, not for keeping alive the memory, but to close it for good? What different ways of remembrance are there? ¿Enterrar lo irracional o abrir una grieta en la memoria? Litvinoff

¿Enterrar lo irracional o abrir una grieta en la memoria? Un análisis de tres documentales sobre el campo de concentración