English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Since its publication, Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason has continuously been subject to numerous analyses, conducted both by those who admire the genius of the philosopher from Königsberg and by those who disagree with his views. The methods used in these studies vary considerably and encompass the tools of logic. This type of analysis was undertaken by Father Józef Maria Bocheński (1902–1995), who called himself “a converted Kantist,” but who was also an expert on logic.1 The beginning of the 20th century was a time of a dynamic development of mathematics and logic. The new approach to logic was named logistics in order to distinguish it from the traditional approach. It was applied in the analysis of philosophical views. Such was the goal of the creators of the Lvov-Warsaw School. Those ideas were also employed in the field of Christian philosophy by the members of the so-called Cracow Circle.2 Its aim was to apply the tools of contemporary logic in the fields of Christian philosophy and theology. The Circle

"J.M. Bocheński’s Logical Analysis of Kant’s Criticism of the Cosmological Argument "