English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article addresses denial of blood transfusion by Jehovah’s Witness patients and conflicts of fundamental rights. For a better understanding of the subject, we address fundamental rights, such as the right to life, the right to liberty and freedom of religion, all from the principle of the dignity of the human person, considered as a basic principle, as well as the beliefs of the Witnesses of Jehovah who justify the refusal of the blood procedure. This work used the method qualitative descriptive, through bibliographical research, examination of books and articles. Thus, this article seeks to demonstrate that, in fact, the conflict of rights can be solved by weighing fundamental rights based on constitutional principle and analysis of the concrete case.

revista da esmesc

A RECUSA À REALIZAÇÃO DE TRANSFUSÃO DE SANGUE POR PACIENTES TESTEMUNHAS DE JEOVÁ: CONFLITO DOS DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS SOB A ÓTICA DO PRINCÍPIO CONSTITUCIONAL DA DIGNIDADE DA PESSOA HUMANA