English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article analyzes whether there is a possibility of legal uncertainty as a consequence of judgments of real cases with similar facts and legal bases, but for which the Supreme Court of Brazil, in its jurisdictional function, rendered opposing decisions. By giving different answers to similar situations, the Supreme Court hinders the predictability of decisions and creates legal uncertainty, damaging the Democratic State of Law. To better understand this work, it is necessary to study constitutionalism, the evolution of fundamental rights, the growing role of the Judiciary and the role of the Federal Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution, with the duty to respect the constitutional text, and to modify its decision-making position, must be the hermeneutical burden that this entails.

revista da esmesc

INSEGURANÇA JURÍDICA NA JURISDIÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL: PROTAGONISMO DO PODER JUDICIÁRIO NO ESTADO DEMOCRÁTICO DE DIREITO, JUDICIALIZAÇÃO DA POLÍTICA, ATIVISMO E AUTORRESTRIÇÃO JUDICIAL