English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The ruling principles of Public Administration in the Constitution of the FederativeRepublic of Brazil have, among the protective measures for its implementation, the constitutional command of punishing acts of administrative misconduct, according to Law no 8.429/1992. However, certain elements regarding the discipline have occasioned some controversy in doctrine and jurisprudence, like the subjective element necessary to its setting, if by fault and/ or a willful misconduct. In this regard, in order to define such a premise, this study lies on the understanding of the concept of administrative misconduct under conceptions rooted in the Constitution, in order to extract what kinds of practices prejudicial to public administration had the legislators towards the punishment, from the distinctive notion of the concepts of legality, morality and probity. Next, the procedures for acts of administrative misconduct, as set out in articles 9th, 10 and 11 of Law no 8.429/1992, are appraised, thus allowing to understand the extent of the subject. Finally, leaning to the nodal point of discussion, in the light of the previously outlined assumptions, the examination of the subjective elements acceptable to the configuration of administrative misconduct are examined.

Elemento subjetivo dos atos de improbidade administrativa: a (in) aplicabilidade da culpa e do dolo